Lever or Button?

In the years after the First World War there was a scramble to find a successful method of ‘self filling’ a fountain pen. Sheaffer’s lever filler led the way and, of course, their version was denied to everyone else. All sorts of methods of compressing a latex sac were offered to the public with varying degrees of success. Only the Conklin Crescent filler lasted and even that eventually died away. Waterman created a version of the lever sufficiently different that Sheaffer could not successfully claim it was a copy of their design. Parker re-thought the whole process of flattening the sac and created the button filler.

These two sac fill designs dominated fountain pen design for many years. Which is the most efficient? Which proved the most popular then and among vintage pen fanciers now?

There’s an aesthetic consideration. The button filler provides an unbroken barrel and a different coloured blind cap may echo a clip screw and/or a section. Until it becomes worn and loses its plating, Waterman’s box lever may be seen as a handsome interruption to the plain or patterned barrel. That design has been copied many times, by companies such as Conway Stewart, Wyvern and De La Rue.

There is another, less visible issue with lever fillers. Waterman designed a swing pressure bar that met the sac quite flat and squeezed the air out very efficiently. Conway Stewart used a similar system, perhaps licensed from Waterman. Other manufacturers adopted the j-bar which is cheaper but addresses the sac at an angle and does not compress it so well. Mabie Todd pens use their own version of the j-bar developed to be more effective.

It is generally assumed that Parker designed the button filler to avoid Sheaffer’s patent and that is undoubtedly so but as a result they created a very efficient system – or a couple of systems, one transferring the pressure of bending the pressure bar to a screw-in section, the other applying it to the button aperture.

I have heard those who occasionally repair a pen say that they dislike the button filler because it is a more difficult repair. There may be a little more to it but of course it isn’t more difficult. In the hands of the user, I would say it is a little easier to fill, though there isn’t much between them. Which system do you prefer, and why?


5 thoughts on “Lever or Button?

  1. I much prefer the button filler for both use and repair. I particularly like the ones where the blind cap is integrated into the design and doesn’t completely come off so the you don’t have to worry about runaway blind caps. For repair I have always found that the lever system, while good, always seems to offer me a different challenge. What with bars coming off the hinge to rusted out boxes. I was surprised when you said that some people think that button fillers are more difficult to repair. In my experience they have always been the easiest.

    1. The Stephens Stud Filler is one of those with the retained blind cap – great pen. Someone commented just yesterday about their difficulty with button fillers. They really are a straightforward repair.

  2. Hej Deb,

    I don’t care too much about filling systems. All, be it lever, leverless or piston work well enorgh.
    Nice pens in each category, I like the SF230 or SM205s beside all those nice leverless Swans.
    A nice green VT340 is at hand, but I didn’t manage to get it’s tube exchanged… that hasn’t top priority as it has to much “bling” for my taste.

    Best wishes

    1. I agree. Whatever the filling system, once the ink is in the pen it is the interface between pen and paper that is important.
      I would love to see your VT340 if you have the occasion to photograph it some time.

      1. Hi,

        sure I will take some photos – today is a bit busy, but the next days…

        Have a great weekend

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.