Conway Stewart 496 Set

IMGP5134 IMGP5135

The 496 is not often seen and that’s a pity because it’s a beautiful pen.  The patterned ones are exceptionally lovely in their schist-like colours but even the black pen is inordinately handsome and stands out from other Conway Stewarts of the time, which is around 1930 – 1935.  The taper at the top of the cap sets it off as something unusual and refined.  It’s not the only Conway Stewart with that elegant profile – I had a piston filler that looked the same some time ago.  The number for that one has slipped from my colander memory, I’m afraid.  You see a similar tapered top in some Onotos and De La Rue pens.  It takes as little as changing the taper on the cap top to take a pen from pleasant to exquisite.

IMGP5141
IMGP5144

The pencil is a handsome Duro Point which has no number.  I can’t tell if these make a true set as they came in a box which is not original and Donahaye’s list shows no paired pencil for the 496.  However, with their matching twin rings they look as though they should be together.
swansac
On an entirely different subject, I see crusty old ossified Conway Stewart sacs all the time.  I showed some a few posts back, in fact.  Mabie Todd ones are rather less common but I found one this week and here it is.  Sorry that the closed end had crumbled  but enough remains to make it recognisable, I think.

Advertisements

About goodwriterspens
I restore fountain pens, and used to trade as redripple52 in eBay. I also have my own fountain pen sales website, www.goodwriterssales.com

2 Responses to Conway Stewart 496 Set

  1. Peter says:

    I have to agree with you Deborah, the tapered cap and barrel plus the domed top set the pen off very well.
    It is surprising that Conway persisted with the squarer shape of the 286/ 475 ranges. I suspect it was down to the very conservative tastes of the home market (or management).

    • Probably, though it was a good seller with De La Rue, and you would think Conway Stewart could have persisted with it. But they didn’t and we’re left with a few models showing these elegant lines.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: