English Duofolds


English Parkers remain among the most underrated pens around.  Not so much the the 51s and 61s, at least partly because our American cousins recognise them, but the whole English Duofold range remains a mystery to overseas buyers.  Maximas and Seniors do somewhat better because they cater to the modern taste for large pens, but the more usual standard Duofolds, Demis, Slimfolds and Juniors sell poorly in comparison with other pens, many of them of considerably less quality.  Though the market has picked up a little recently, I still see Slimfolds, Juniors and the similar Victory Mark V passing through ebay without a bid.

My own favourite is the Duofold AF.  It has a lot going for it.  The splendid Duofold nib – usually firm but not quite as rigid as the American counterpart – remains consistent throughout the Newhaven production.  The aluminium filler looks a lot better than the traditional button.  It’s  finely machined and has a very modern look about it, as though it might be a part for a moon rocket or at the very least a snazzy sports car.  It’s an easy fix when it needs a sac and it holds a decent quantity of ink.  Externally, the Aerometric Duofold is the same pen with the same writing characteristics and many people like it but I think of it as Parker’s first step back from ingenious filling solutions.  Having to take the barrel off to fill the pen is not an advance in convenience.  Having done so, you’re faced with a bulb filler with a protective metal surround – nineteen thirties technology in a nineteen fifties pen.  Thereafter came the descent to Parker pens being mere holders for cartridges, which ensured that the buyer handed the company large profits in perpetuity.

That doesn’t mean that the Aerometric was worse than other pens that were being produced at the time.  The reverse is true.  Despite the dated technology the quality was so high that the pen sold in huge numbers, even at a time when the ballpoint was beginning to dominate the industry.  Though a little subject to cap lip cracks, Aerometrics otherwise just don’t fail.  They’ve kept on going until today with no servicing and indications are that they’ll see all of us off.  Though the plastic they’re made from is soft enough that barrel imprints can wear off, it’s thick and robust.  The sac is so durable that today hardly one in fifty needs replacing.  The sac protector may dull and discolour with age but it remains completely sound, unlike, for instance, many of Conway Stewart’s Pressac protectors.  The nib has a good lump of tipping material, and the pens continue to write as they did when new.

That quality extends throughout the range.  The Junior was cheaper only because it was smaller and had less gold in the nib, not because the quality was less.  That’s shown by the vast numbers of Juniors and Slimfolds that continue to appear in ebay, just in need of a flush and a wipe with the polishing cloth to look as good as new.

Try one, from the first Newhaven Duofolds, through the New Style, Aluminium Filler and Aerometric.  There’s plenty to choose from.


7 thoughts on “English Duofolds

  1. Yes! Absolutely yes!
    The English Duofolds are my favourite pens. I have already the pretty collection, but I’m still looking for the new variants. Beginning from Valentines (and earlier Whytwarts) and Victories Mk.I, through Duofolds NS, Duofolds AF, next models of Victory, aerometric Duofolds, till P17, New Slimfolds – exciting story and beautiful, classic, reliable pens. Very good writers, fantastic gold nibs, reliable, stable sacs made of plyglass (aerometric). And the French and Danish models (including Populars, Students). Additionally, if you go deeper in the English Duofolds history, you find new questions, mysteries, uncertainties. And the information sources are very limited. One has always something new to do.
    And what is maybe interesting for you – one of my first English Duofolds I’ve bought from you.

  2. Interesting post, as usual. A couple of years ago I bought a pen that was advertised as a Victory Mark V. Can I assume from Adam’s response that this belongs somewhere in the Duofold lineage? A really nice pen to use, but I’m shamefully ignorant about it. Aerometric filler. Maybe a mid-60s pen?

    Adam, do you know of any good online sources to look further into? Vaguely familiar with the name Valentine, but I’ve never met one in person, and Whytwarts doesn’t ring a bell at all. Thanks!

    1. The Victories are a sort of offshoot of the Duofolds. By time your Aerometric one came along, they were very similar to some of the Duofold range. The Mark V dates to 1953. Have a look here for a good source http://parkerpens.net/. Valentine and Whytwarth earlier were pans made at the site that became Parker’s Newhaven factory. Parker had a production contract with Valentine prior to WWII and then bought out the plant at the end of the war. Going back even earlier than Whytwarth, Felix Macauley established the first pen manufacturing plant on the site in 1921. Little is known about Macauley. Macauley pens appear to have been mostly for export. They’re rare now and have an interesting filling system.

  3. Thanks. Just saw your contribution to a discussion of a Macauley on FPN. Those look like tricky old things. Pretty, though.

  4. parkerpens.net is a correct address. You will find there many informations. You can also go to the FPN – some posts & photos may be interesting for you.

Leave a Reply to Matt Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.